Adopting Gender-Neutral Titles in Congress.
Time to Bring Congress into the 21st Linguistic Century
March 8 is International Women’s Day. In recognition of the movement for gender parity, and all that still needs to be done, I propose a Congressional House Resolution to update the outdated and mossy titles of “Congressman” and “Congresswoman.”
American society has long ago recognized the importance of inclusive language in many professional titles. For example, we no longer say "policeman" – we say "police officer." We've replaced "fireman" with "firefighter" and "mailman" with "mail carrier" or “postal worker.” These changes reflect our understanding that professions are not defined by gender. The logic behind these previous language updates applies equally to Congress.
It is time to bring Congressional terminology in line with this established practice by adopting "Congressmember" in place of "Congressman" or "Congresswoman." When we stopped using "policeman," we acknowledged that law enforcement careers are open to all qualified individuals regardless of gender. When we adopted "firefighter," we recognized that bravery and public service know no gender. Similarly, using "Congressmember" affirms that legislative service is about ability, dedication, and constituent representation—not gender.
The gender-specific titles currently used in Congress are remnants of an era when women were largely excluded from political leadership. While we've made progress in representation, our language should catch up to our values. A uniform "Congressmember" title puts the focus where it belongs – on the vital work of legislating and representing the American people.
By extension, Congress should also replace “gentleman” and “gentlewoman” or “gentlelady” with “colleague” or simply “Representative.” While perhaps once considered polite, they again unnecessarily highlight gender in a professional context where it should be irrelevant. Using "Colleague" or “Representative” rightly puts the focus on the shared work of serving in Congress.
Some may argue that this change, while well-intentioned, is largely symbolic and does little to address substantive issues of gender inequality in government or society. This is a fair point. Adopting gender-neutral terminology is not a panacea. However, language matters. The words we use shape perceptions and send signals, even subtly, about the values of our society.
Congress has an opportunity to lead by example and demonstrate its commitment to equality by modernizing these antiquated titles. These are the key reasons why I am calling on Congress to introduce a House Resolution to formally adopt "Congressmember" as its standard terminology. This change would align Congressional language with established practices across other institutions and professions that have already successfully transitioned to gender-neutral titles.
Retiring gendered language in favor of more neutral and inclusive terms is an important step that Congress should wholeheartedly embrace. While just one part of the broader work of advancing equality, it's a meaningful way to signal and reinforce our values. I urge Congress to pass the resolution without delay and set a powerful example for the nation to follow.
Here is my proposed House Resolution:
H. RES. [NUMBER]
Recognizing the need for gender-neutral and equitable language in the United States House of Representatives.
Whereas, the United States House of Representatives (the House) honors the diversity, dignity, and equality of all individuals, regardless of sex, gender, or gender identity;
Whereas, gender-specific titles such as “Congressman” and “Congresswoman,” are a holdover from an earlier era that were perhaps once considered polite, they unnecessarily highlight gender in a professional context where it should be irrelevant.
Whereas, the terms “Congressmember” and “Member of Congress” affirm that legislative service is about ability, dedication, and constituent representation—not gender;
Whereas, the use of updated terminology would align Congressional language with established practices across other institutions and professions that have already successfully transitioned to gender-neutral titles;
Whereas, the House is committed to fostering an inclusive and equitable environment that respects the contributions of all members as equals;
Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That the House of Representatives—
Encourages the use of the terms “Congressmember” or “Member of Congress” in place of “Congressman” or “Congresswoman” to refer to all members collectively or individually in all official documents, communications, and proceedings, thereby affirming the equal status of all members.
Adopts the practice of referring to individual members as “our colleague from [state/district]” or “Representative [name]” (or similar inclusive terms) instead of “Gentleman”, “Gentlewoman”, or “Gentlelady”, further emphasizing the equal footing of all members.
Directs the Committee on House Administration to ensure that all written rules, regulations, and guidelines are updated to reflect these changes and to provide guidance for their implementation, with a focus on promoting equality.
Urges all members and staff to adopt these terms in verbal communication and correspondence as a standard practice, recognizing the importance of language in shaping perceptions of equality.
Affirms that these changes shall take effect immediately upon the adoption of this resolution and shall apply to all subsequent sessions of Congress, as a testament to the House’s commitment to gender equality and equity.